ahem
Welcome to what I believe is the single biggest problem for Clinton. It’s Bush, America’s second “legacy” president. It’s not that any Democratic voter will believe she will be like the younger Bush as president — it’s that Democrats may want to break the cycle of Bush, Clinton, Bush and Clinton. It’s possible voters got the “change” bug out of their system in ‘06, but if not, the fatigue of the same people in charge for a 20-year period (or basically, a generation) is going to be a problem.
Me, almost two years ago:
Hillary Clinton is a great politician, and I have no doubt that she would make a great President. My preference, though, is for her to remain a Senator, and only because I do not believe that consolidating the power of the Presidency to two families is healthy for our democracy.
And me again, just over a year ago:
Absent in a lot of discussions (including Drum’s post) of whether Clinton will run or can win is the very important question of whether having another Clinton follow twenty years of Bushes and Clintons is a healthy development for our democracy. I believe that this question is just as relevant as whether Clinton can actually win.



